Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required

 

 

 

 

BROWSE BY TOPIC

ABOUT FINANCIALISH

We seek to provide information, insights and direction that may enable the Financial Community to effectively and efficiently operate in a regulatory risk-free environment by curating content from all over the web.

 

Stay Informed with the latest fanancialish news.

 

SUBSCRIBE FOR
NEWSLETTERS & ALERTS

FOLLOW US

Lawsuits/Arbitrations

Unpaid Arbitration Awards: Time for a Wall Street Anti-Fraud Fund

April 25, 2019

by Howard Haykin

 

In his April 23rd BrokeAndBroker blog, FINRA Arbitrators Dismiss Customer Claims Involving Stanford International Bank CDs, attorney Bill Singer reiterated his long-standing advocacy for the creation of an "Anti-Fraud Fund" on Wall Street to benefit defrauded public customers who have obtained arbitration awards of compensatory damages, costs, and arbitration fees but are unable to fully collect those awards from insolvent industry firms and registered representatives.

 

 

Mr. Singer goes on to say:

 

Bill does not favor extending such a guaranty into punitive damages or "unreasonable" attorneys' fee and other charges, but he does believe that the securities industry has the wherewithal and the moral/ethical obligation to put its money where its dirty mouth has been. While there may be legitimate debate as to how best to fund the anti-fraud fund, that only goes to the mechanics of doing the right thing. In the case of [FINRA], we have [an SRO] that needs to get behind this pro-consumer effort and with haste. ... FINRA's regulatory mandate is set out in FINRA Rule 2010: Standards of Commercial Honor and Principles of Trade: "A member, in the conduct of its business, shall observe high standards of commercial honor and just and equitable principles of trade." Today's BrokeAndBroker.com Blog asks whether the [SRO] itself will observe high standards of commercial honor and just and equitable principles of trade when it comes to seeing that justice is done for defrauded public investors.

 

 

AN OFT-REPEATED DISCUSSION.    Mr. Singer’s plea isn’t the first time that the idea of an anti-fraud fund has been raised. Here are 3 postings from BrokeAndBroker and Financialish where both Mr. Singer and I have expressed similar concerns:

 

 

 

 

 

That last referenced posting reported on proposed Senate legislation, sponsored by Senator Elizabeth Warren, that would require FINRA to establish a relief fund in order to provide investors with the full value of unpaid arbitration awards issued against brokerage firms or brokers regulated by FINRA. SIFMA testified against the proposal, expressing serious concern that such an industry-financed pool “would be unfair to the broker-dealers who honor their arbitration award obligations.”

 

 

FINANCIALISH TAKE AWAYS.    I believe that it's time for the industry to once again address the problem. There's no justification for inaction because with each passing day more and more public investors are being left out hanging to dry.

 

And regarding the debate about how best to fund the so-called anti-fraud fund, take Mr. Singer's advice: that only goes to the mechanics of doing the right thing. FINRA needs to get behind this pro-consumer effort and with haste.